Courts "inconsistent" on precaution principle

Courts in the EU have applied the precautionary principle in an "inconsistent and arbitrary manner" because it lacks a standard legally binding definition, according to free market think tank IPN. Speaking in Brussels on Wednesday law lecturer and co-author of a new book on the subject, Gary Marchant, said it was "unprecedented" to apply a principle in court and not define it. He said an examination of recent rulings on environmental risk, for example on hazardous waste, genetically modified organisms or chemicals, showed the courts' interpretation of the principle was confused. See IPN.

Please sign in to access this article. To subscribe, view our subscription options, or take out a free trial.

Please enter your details

Forgotten password?

Having trouble signing in?

Contact Customer Support at
or call 020 8267 8120

Not a subscriber?

Take a free trial now to discover the critical insights and updates our coverage offers subscribers.