Last year, EU governments agreed, after long argument, with the Commission's proposal that the directive should allow member states freedom to decide how they charge for waste facilities in ports (ENDS Daily 18 June 1999). The decision reflected a "delicate balance" between the wide variety of charging systems already in place in the EU, according to the Commission.
MEPs, however, are insisting that the most effective way to remove incentives for ship owners to dump waste at sea is to introduce an EU-wide charging system in which the cost of waste disposal facilities was included in the basic port fee, which all ships would pay regardless of how much waste they offloaded (ENDS Daily 17 March). A version of the system operating in Baltic Sea ports has been successful, they say.
In its official response to the MEPs' proposed amendments, the Commission rubbishes the Parliament's position, saying there is "no evidence of a universally 'best' European-wide fee system". It says the no-special-fee system would even have the disadvantage of "not encouraging shipowners to introduce cleaner techniques, such as clean engine rooms."
Moreover, it says, since the basic port fee would have to increase, the no-special-fee would mean short-sea shipping operations, which use ports more frequently, would bear a disproportionate share of the cost. However, the Commission held out the prospect of a future change to the charging system: it would propose "further measures" if monitoring showed the system had "potential undesired effects". Ministers will now consider the proposed directive at second reading.
Please enter your details
Not a subscriber?
Take a free trial now to discover the critical insights and updates our coverage offers subscribers.